What is said and seen: Reflections on Auschwitz-Birkenau

Yet our knowledge of the history of the Germans’ policy of racial and social engineering effected through mass murder already colours our expectation of the landscapes and topography we will find. Just as we both expect and want the perpetrators to look evil, similarly we wish to invest the landscapes of the Holocaust with evil and tragedy. People prefer to take photographs of Auschwitz when it is snowy or raining or has leaden skies. If it does not match our expectations, then we may regard the site as out of place. But the reality both then and now is different.
Andrew Charlesworth
Print on a wall in Hebrew and English. The English text reads: ""Come here you free citizen of the world, whose life is safeguarded by human morality and whose existence is guaranteed through law. I want to tell you how modern criminals and common bandits have betrayed the morality of life and nullified the postulates of existence". Zalman Gradowski, Sonderkommando prisoner, Birkenau Death Camp"

In preparation for this trip, I spent a lot of time reading about land. I’m interested in the construction of land after catastrophe: the doubling that exists for Poland, specifically, to preserve a history erased (literally and/or figuratively) with the tension of memorializing that history. I find myself fascinated by the fragile project of keeping space for a history where the populace has to reconcile the impossible question of how to have an "after" following atrocity on an unimaginable scale. 

Andre Corboz’s article “The Land as Palimpset” (published in the journal Diogenes in 1983) includes a section on the meaning of maps that resonated deeply for me, and I think in its whole can be also be read as a definition for the practice of history and remembrance (bolding mine):

To represent the land means to understand it. But such representation is not a tracing but always a creation. A map is drawn first to know and then to act. It has in common with the land the fact of being a process, a product, a project. And since it is also form and meaning, there is a danger that it be taken for a subject. Created as a model, with the fascination of a microcosm, an extremely malleable simplification, it tends to substitute itself for reality. The map is purer than the land, for it obeys the prince. It is open to every design which it concretizes by anticipation and whose correctness it seems to prove. This sort of trompe l’oeil not only visualizes the actual territory to which it refers, it can incarnate things which are not. It can show non-existent land just as seriously as an actual one, which shows that it is better to be prudent. It is constantly in danger of dissimulating what it is supposed to be making clear. How many regimes hoping to be effective think they lead a country when in fact they only govern a map?
Andre Corboz

Brett Kaplan was also influential to me in this respect. Here's a snippet:

Landscapes in which traumatic events happened, or where perpetrators dreamed up violent scenarios, can bear only unstable witness. On the one hand, visible traces of the past remain; on the other hand, an inevitable covering up of these traces by the movement of the landscape as nature either reclaims it or human desires reshape and repurpose it occurs.
Brett Kaplan

I was worried about visiting Auschwitz-Birkenau. I know what I was intending - to bear witness, to *see* - and I had an inkling I wouldn't have much time to do that. In part, that was true.

There isn't a slow time to visit. The museum and memorial runs tours every 15 minutes in multiple languages, and you move at a clipped pace for the full duration. There is no down time to reflect. We took the 6 hour tour and still felt rushed. Our tour guide was excellent, though well rehearsed probably underlines the problem I had somewhat. I didn't really want to hustle through a walking documentary, but as far as I understand it, you can't visit without a guided tour.

I wasn't sure I absorbed much, honestly, until I came home and had some down time. I have a pretty deep understanding of the history, and I found myself frequently lagging behind to try to carve out a moment of reflection when the guide was covering something I knew well. This isn't a place for that; maybe it shouldn't be.

So what of Auschwitz-Birkenau as place? How does it manifest as witness for me?

When I got home, I realized I saw Auschwitz-Birkenau through its trees, and you'll see that reflected in the gallery below. I found this write up later, and this excerpted poem:

I don't know which of the trees I saw may have stood during the period of operation, but they stand now, and watch as people carve time out to visit this place of mourning. The trees are keeping the integrity of this place, I think.

Click the first image to open a gallery with descriptions.

When I got back to our rooms, I ventured out to get some food. I stumbled into the New Jewish Cemetery, and finally had a breathing moment to reflect on what I had seen. The graveyard was riotous with plant life, and the sky seemed to be speaking prayers with the sunset. I paused to think about the dead who do not rest in such beautiful places and have no private matzevot to mark their bones at rest.

The New Jewish Cemetery at sunset, with ivy covered matzevot and trees.

This post was a bit esoteric, and though I do think it may help someone, someday, wrestle with the complexity of visiting these sites, and I wanted to capture my own thinking, I risk effacing the true horror of this place and the people who were killed here. I'll end my post here with some poetry contemporaneous to the period of the Warsaw Ghetto written by Itzhak Katzenelson.

Itzhak’s story is emblematic of the Jewish experience in Poland. He was in the Warsaw ghetto right through to the uprising. During this time, he wrote prolifically. His plays were performed at the Janus Korczak orphanage for the children who were later escorted by Korczak to Treblinka (I’ll have more to share of Janus’s story later). His wife, Hanna, and his two younger sons, Yomel and Benzion, were deported to the Treblinka death camp shortly after the mass clearing of the ghetto began, on August 14, 1942, where they were murdered. Itzhak was hidden in the Aryan section shortly after the Warsaw uprising began with his remaining son Zvi and was later deported to Birkenau, by way of the Vittel Camp and Drancy transit camp, where he and Zvi were murdered on May 1, 1944. That we have his writing today is a fierce testimony to the will of survivors who retrieved it from hiding.

In the Shoah exhibit, Primo Levi's quote is printed on a wall between two windows. It reads in English: "It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say."

Reading List

Corboz, André. “The Land as Palimpsest.” Diogenes 31, no. 121 (1983): 12–34. Full text here.

Kaplan, Brett Ashley. Landscapes of Holocaust Postmemory. Routledge, 2011.

Charlesworth, Andrew. “The Topography of Genocide.” In The Historiography of the Holocaust, edited by Dan Stone. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

About Itzhak Katzenelson

Yivo Encyclopedia of Jews in Europe

EHRI Archives - The Itzhak Katzenelson Collection

Culture.PL entry

About "The Song of the Murdered Jewish People": Andrzej Pawelec and Magdalena Sitarz, “Yitskhok Katsenelson’s ‘Dos Lid Fun Oysgehargetn Yidishn Folk’ as an Autobiography of the Poet and His Nation,” Autobiografia 8 (January 1, 2017): 83–98, https://doi.org/10.18276/au.2017.1.8-05. Link here.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *